Gap Analysis

Every active gap, the evidence behind it, and the skill components a build would need to close.

Demo data
Gaps shown874 active in total
People affected306
Need training213
Average confidence86%

Severity mix in this view

Updates with the filters below.

8gaps shown
  • Critical1
  • High3
  • Medium4
  • Low0
Ranked

Gaps by priority

Priority points combine gap size, exposure, evidence confidence and operational urgency.

Critical

1. Machine Setup & Calibration

Production · Machine Setup, Level 1

24priority points

Five independent signals agree completed training has not translated into demonstrated setup capability; large cohort

People affected42
Confidence94%
Components9
Job sheet and changeover planningTooling fit and alignmentParameter entry and first piece checkStartup verification sequence
High

2. Troubleshooting

Production · Fault Isolation & Recovery, Level 2

19priority points

Scenario decisions, repeated fault-code questions and downtime data converge on the same fault-isolation weakness

People affected67
Confidence91%
Components5
Symptom captureFault code interpretationFault isolation methodSafe restart and line recovery
High

3. Preventive Maintenance

Maintenance · PM Execution & Documentation

14priority points

Supervisor ratings, knowledge checks and late work-order completion indicate procedural and documentation gaps

People affected31
Confidence88%
Components4
PM schedule adherencePM standard work executionPM documentationParts and lubrication discipline
High

4. Quality Inspection

Quality · Visual Inspection & Defect Classification

14priority points

Practical checks and dialogue performance identify inconsistent measurement and defect classification; supporting rework signal

People affected54
Confidence85%
Components4
Visual inspection techniqueMeasurement and gaugingDefect classificationRework and disposition decisions
Medium

5. Lockout/Tagout

Production · LOTO Verification Refresher

11priority points

Certification expiry creates immediate exposure; scenario and near-miss evidence shows the verification step needs reinforcement

People affected19
Confidence90%
Components4
Isolation point identificationZero energy verificationGroup lockout controlPermits, tags and records
Medium

6. Root Cause Analysis

Cross-department · Corrective Action Design

10priority points

Scenario performance shows cause analysis held but corrective action design and effectiveness verification weak

People affected38
Confidence83%
Components4
Cause and effect analysis5-why disciplineCorrective action designEffectiveness verification
Medium

7. Process Control

Engineering, Operations · Control Chart Interpretation

9priority points

Knowledge checks in Developing band; drift events occasionally missed per SAP signals

People affected26
Confidence80%
Components4
Control chart interpretationProcess drift recognitionOut of control responseProcess documentation
Medium

8. Machine Calibration

Production · Calibration Interval Control

9priority points

Interval lapses in calibration records; low-confidence scores pending verification

People affected29
Confidence78%
Components4
Calibration interval controlCalibration tolerance interpretationOut of tolerance escalationCalibration record keeping
Open the Build Plan